- Except for some degenerate cases, message passing in the presence of cycles is strictly suboptimal.
- For codes with cycles, message passing no longer performs MAP decoding.
A collection of random thoughts and materials that might prove enlightening to me and my friends.
MathJax
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Message passing on codes with cycles
Section 2.7 Modern coding theory
Monday, December 22, 2014
Interesting courses Winter 2015
- ECE 275A Parameter Estimation II
- TuTh 5:00p-6:20p York 4050A Kreutz-Delgado, Kenneth
- ECE 285 Sparsity and Compressed Sensing
- MW 5:00p-6:20p WLH 2110 Rao, B
- ECE 259C Advanced Topics in Coding
- TuTh 5:00p-6:20p HSS 2305B Siegel, Paul
- CSE 250B Learning Algorithms
- TuTh 3:30p-4:50p CENTR 105 Dasgupta, Sanjoy
- MATH 245B Convex Analysis
- MWF 4:00p-4:50p APM 7421 Nie, Jiawang
- MATH 251B Lie Groups
- MWF 1:00p-1:50p APM B412 Kemp, Todd
- MATH 282B Applied Statistics II
- TuTh 11:30a-12:50p APM 5402 Arias-Castro, Ery
- MATH 280B Probability Theory
- MW 5:00p-6:20p APM 5402 Williams, Ruth J
Wednesday, December 03, 2014
Application of matrix congruence and similarity
A homework problem in statistical parameter estimation asks us to show that for two symmetric positive definite matrices Σ1 and Σ2.
If Σ1≤Σ2, then Σ−11≥Σ−12
Note that by assumption B=Σ2−Σ1 is positive semi-definite. If I can show that the resolvent identity of Σ−11−Σ−12, Σ−12(Σ2−Σ1)Σ−11 is positive semi-definite, then the above statement is verified.
This requires the following two results:
Sylvester's Law of Inertia
The main point from Theorem 1 is that multiplying a positive definite matrix A to any symmetric matrix B will not change the inertia of the result. Note that Σ−12 and Σ−11 are positive definite. We let Σ−12=A1, Σ−11=A2 and Σ2−Σ1=B, and applying Theorem 1 twice, leads to Σ−12(Σ2−Σ1)Σ−11 positive semi-definite. We have shown Σ−11−Σ−12 is indeed positive semi-definite.
Caution!
If Σ1≤Σ2, then Σ−11≥Σ−12
Note that by assumption B=Σ2−Σ1 is positive semi-definite. If I can show that the resolvent identity of Σ−11−Σ−12, Σ−12(Σ2−Σ1)Σ−11 is positive semi-definite, then the above statement is verified.
This requires the following two results:
Sylvester's Law of Inertia
Symmetric matrices A and B are congruent (i.e. there is a non-singular matrix C such that CTAC=B) if and only if A and B have the same inertia. They have the same number of positive, negative and zero eigenvalues.Theorem 1.
The product of a symmetric positive definite matrix A and a symmetric matrix B has the same inertia as BProof
Note that A−1/2ABA1/2=A1/2BA1/2. The right hand side is similar to AB, which means they have the same eigenvalues. Since A1/2 is symmetric, the matrix A1/2BA1/2 is congruent to B. By Sylvester's Law of inertia, the eignevalues of B have the same inertia as A1/2BA1/2 and also of AB.
The main point from Theorem 1 is that multiplying a positive definite matrix A to any symmetric matrix B will not change the inertia of the result. Note that Σ−12 and Σ−11 are positive definite. We let Σ−12=A1, Σ−11=A2 and Σ2−Σ1=B, and applying Theorem 1 twice, leads to Σ−12(Σ2−Σ1)Σ−11 positive semi-definite. We have shown Σ−11−Σ−12 is indeed positive semi-definite.
Caution!
For real positive definite matrices, not all of them are symmetric! For example, given a symmetric positive definite matrix B and a anti-symmetric matrix C (CT=−C), the sum of which (A=B+C) is positive definite. Extra care must be taken. All references of positive definiteness are within the context of symmetric matrices.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)